acquitting

Months after acquitting foreign NGO workers, Egypt civil society groups still remain at risk

A defendant in Egypt's notorious "foreign funding" case on Tuesday tweeted a photo of his official acquittal papers received by post.

Many of those involved in the controversial case involving NGO workers were banned from travel, had assets frozen and faced up to 25 years in prison.

"At last! just received my acquittal papers from #Egypt in the notorious NGO foreign funding case. I and my colleagues in the case are now free, but don't forget the many brave Egyptians - including NGO workers - still under threat from gov repression," tweeted Charles W Dunne, a Fellow in at the Arab Center Washington DC.

Dunne was one of 43 defendants in Egypt's notorious "foreign funding" case - also dubbed "Case 173" - part of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's vicious clampdown on civil society groups.

Egypt acquitted the 43 civil society defenders - mostly foreigners - who fell foul of draconian laws aimed at curbing the activities of civil society groups.

Months on from the successful appeal, however, the safety of Egypt's NGO workers continues to hang in the balance.

Since the NGOs case opened on 2013, Egyptian authorities have frozen the assets of at least six rights groups and ten human rights advocates, while at least 30 human rights workers and administrators have been banned from travel.

Among the organisations targeted was the renowned Al-Nadeem Centre for Torture Rehabilitation, which was ordered to close in February 2017.

Those still behind bars following the clampdown is Egyptian human rights defender Hisham Gaafar, director of the Mada Foundation for Media Development, who has been held for more than three years in pre-trial detention. The fate of Ezzat Ghoneim, co-founder of the Egyptian Coordination for Rights and Freedoms, is still unknown after he was forcibly disappeared in September last year.

The crackdown on rights groups has been accompanied by a defamation campaign by the pro-government media that portrayed activists behind Egypt's 2011 uprising as foreign agents, paid to plunge Cairo into chaos for the benefit of its enemies.

General-turned-president Sisi has blamed the uprising for the country’s economic woes, labeling it the wrong remedy that followed a misdiagnosis.

Faced with criticism of Egypt's crackdown on civil society groups, Sisi's regime has pledged to revise a law that placed draconian restrictions on the work of civil society groups, with the intention of reducing the veto power given to security agencies over their work. 

That task will most likely leave unchanged the restrictions placed on rights and pro-democracy groups, but relax them for medical, housing and social charities.

"Since the 'foreign funding' case was opened Egyptian human rights defenders have been treated as enemies of the state, subjected to an unprecedented crackdown, including asset freezes, travel bans and prosecutions," said Najia Bounaim, Head of Campaigns for North Africa at Amnesty International, following the acquittal of the 43 NGO workers in December.

"The key test now will be whether today's court decision paves the way for an end to the persecution of all human rights defenders in the country. The Egyptian authorities must lift all travel bans and asset freezes against NGO staff and drop their investigations into Egyptian NGOs and human rights defenders for their legitimate human rights work."

Counsel calls for acquitting Gamini Senerath and three others

COLOMBO (News 1st) – The hearing of evidence from the prosecutors in the case filed against four defendants including Gamini Senerath, Chief of Staff of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa was taken up at the Permanent High Court Trial at Bar today(February 12). The case was taken up before Judges Sampath Abeyakoon, Sampath Wijeyarathne and Champa Janaki.

Deputy Solicitor General Thusith Mudalige appearing on behalf of the Attorney General said that the hearing of evidence from the prosecutors will conclude today(February 12).

The counsel representing the defendants addressing courts noted that he will make an application that the defendants be acquitted without calling the defence, as the prosecution has been unable to prove the guilt of the defendants beyond reasonable doubt. The counsel stressed that he will be making the application under section 200 of the criminal procedure code.

The case was postponed to February 22nd.

Pakistan: Supreme Court dismisses review plea against verdict acquitting Asia Bibi of blasphemy

Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a review petition challenging the acquittal of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy, The Express Tribune reported. On October 31, the Supreme Court had reversed the verdicts of a trial court and the Lahore High Court, acquitting Bibi of the charge of blasphemy.

Bibi, a farm worker, was convicted in 2010 for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Islam, after her neighbours objected to her drinking water from their glass, as she was not a Muslim. In 2011, Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab province, was assassinated by his own bodyguard for supporting Bibi.

A three-member bench, headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, rejected the plea filed by prayer leader Qari Muhammad Salaam on the grounds that the petition failed to prove any shortcomings in the verdict, The Express Tribune reported. “Does Islam say that one should be punished if the crime is not proven?” Khosa asked Salaam’s counsel.

Salaam’s counsel had told the court that it must take the opinion of Muslim clergy and religious scholars into consideration. The court turned down the argument and said the case was not a matter of religion. “Tell us where we failed to take into account testimony or where we misread the testimonies,” Justice Khosa asked.

There were widespread protests in Pakistan following Bibi’s acquittal. Besides Khosa, the bench comprised justices Qazi Faez Isa and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Dawn reported. Salaam, who lives in a village in Nankana Sahib tehsil, had lodged a first information report about the alleged blasphemy incident back in 2010.

The Islamabad administration on Monday made stringent security arrangements in the capital ahead of the verdict. Paramilitary troops were deployed in sensitive zones in the city. Islamabad District Magistrate Muhammad Hamza Shafqaat had written to the higher authorities asking for the deployment of Pakistani Rangers in the capital, The Express Tribune reported.

Bibi’s lawyer Saif-ul Malook, who had fled to the Netherlands after the October judgement, returned to Pakistan to represent her. He told Reuters before the hearing on Monday that he expected the review plea to be dismissed. “They have filed the petition on flimsy grounds,” he had said. “They have not attempted to counter her release on constitutional grounds.”